Nicolas Bruna vs Mariano Kestelboim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Aug at 03:58 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Bruna vs M. Kestelboim

CHI
1
Win
Played
1
Win

ARG
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Bruna 1 - 1 Kestelboim
They have played 4 sets in total, with Nicolas Bruna winning 2 and Mariano Kestelboim winning 2. The last match between Nicolas Bruna and Mariano Kestelboim was at the M25 Trelew, 26-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Nicolas Bruna getting the victory 6-3 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bruna | 1 |
| Kestelboim | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Trelew(08-26-25)
(R2) M15 Maldonado(11-28-19)
N. Bruna vs M. Kestelboim H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 49.24% (194-200) | Career Total W/L | 59.91% (411-275) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 5 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Bruna vs M. Kestelboim Match Preview:
- Bruna has a slight edge in recent second serve performance, securing 45.29% of points compared to Kestelboim's 39.88%. Could this offer her an advantage?
- When it comes to returning games, Kestelboim shows marginally better stats, winning 44.99% of opponents' second serve points, whilst Bruna is at 43.76%.
- Looking at their first serve return capability, Kestelboim again has a better number, achieving 34% to Bruna's 32.06%.
- Bruna tends to handle pressure slightly better, saving 53.8% of breakpoints, compared to Kestelboim's 49.03%. Could this be crucial in tight matches?
- In the past year, Kestelboim boasts a higher match win percentage at 59.38%, while Bruna stands at 54.55%.
- Bruna has the best win rate on indoor hard surfaces at 100% (though in limited matches), while Kestelboim excels on clay with a 60% success rate, showing clear surface preferences.
- Bruna mainly competes in lower-level tournaments with a win rate of 54.55%, whereas Kestelboim plays in slightly more competitive events with a 52.27% victory rate.
- Their previous head-to-head encounter favored Kestelboim, who won in three sets.
- Bruna has faced slightly tougher opponents ranking-wise, with an average rank of 201.65, against Kestelboim's 375.06.
- Kestelboim is more reliable in deciding set scenarios, winning 56% compared to Bruna's 50% win rate.
- Bruna has a lower breakpoint conversion rate at 31.62%, whereas Kestelboim converts 34.9% of such opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (August 26, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Bruna and Kestelboim presents a fascinating contest of strengths and weaknesses. Bruna's superior second serve performance and ability under pressure could give her crucial points in key moments. However, Kestelboim's stronger return game and previous head-to-head victory cannot be ignored.
Considering surface preferences, Bruna might have an edge if the match is played on indoor hard courts, but Kestelboim's commendable clay record highlights his versatility. Additionally, Kestelboim's experience in more challenging tournament levels and his ability to navigate deciding sets favorably point towards a possible advantage.
While both players have aspects working in their favor, the combination of Kestelboim's return game strength, past head-to-head success, and better breakpoint conversion may make him the more likely winner in this tennis matchup.
Nicolas Bruna vs Mariano Kestelboim Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Bruna vs M. Kestelboim H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 14 | Games Won | 18 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:18:45 | Average Match Time | 1:18:45 |
| 54% (52/96) | 1st Serve % | 71% (49/69) |
| 56% (29/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (36/49) |
| 52% (23/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 75% (15/20) |
| 75% (3/4) | Break Pts Won % | 71% (5/7) |
| 26% (18/69) | Return Points Win % | 46% (44/96) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Bruna Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 7-6(3) | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 0-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
M. Kestelboim Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 7-6(3) 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 7-6(5) | ||

N. Bruna vs M. Kestelboim Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49.24% (194/200) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.91% (411/275) |
| 49.94% (451/452) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.10% (900/649) |
| 50.69% (4434/4313) | Games Win/Loss | 54.11% (7481/6345) |
| 27.27% (6/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.33% (35/25) |
| 50.27% (185/183) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.16% (376/249) |
| 75.00% (3/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 527 | Aces Total | 447 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 524 | Total Double Faults | 1086 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:25:57 |
| 257.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 491.43 |
| 58% (7057/12165) | 1st Serve % | 72% (24551/34263) |
| 65% (4557/7057) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (15048/24551) |
| 46% (2339/5108) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (4679/9724) |
| 41% (469/1144) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2147/4558) |
| 40% (4567/11469) | Return Points Win % | 46% (16086/34899) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/12) | Challenger W/L | 51.64% (63/59) |
| 50.79% (194/188) | Futures W/L | 61.81% (348/215) |
| 49% (191/390) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (403/672) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
| 46% (37/81) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (56/114) |
| 44% (52/117) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (101/184) |
| 85% (192/164) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (402/360) |
| 15% (192/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (402/41) |
| 14% (202/29) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (284/49) |